Digital Marketing Myth: Content Must be Visual

Pam Sahota — Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:21:36 +0000

As digital marketers, many of us realize the need for visual content. There are more visually appealing social channels then we can count – but of course you have the usual suspects such as Facebook, Instagram, Vine, Snapchat, YouTube, Pinterest and more. Should you have visual content? Yes. Should it be your only content? Not necessarily.

We’ve probably all heard of it by now, but Serial – the podcast – is a great example of this non-visual content trend. An old medium, but great engaging content. Why did it work? A few reasons:

Great content – It didn’t have to be visual to be great content. The key was the story. The story was engaging, suspenseful, and it got people talking.
Word of mouth – It got people talking to their colleagues, their family members, and their friends – in person and on social.
Suspense – It was told in a manner that left the listener excited for the next episode release.
Short – It was long enough to feel like something you’re investing in, but short enough that you could listen to an episode on a train ride, a gym workout, or while you’re cooking dinner.
It was real – The people and the content were real. The history and storyline were true. It made you invest in what was going on because you wanted to know more.

Great podcast, and now the people want more. The next season will come in 2015, and the masses are waiting. Why? Again – content doesn’t have to be visual to be great and shareable. As you can see from the Topsy screenshot below, the topic is still being talked about (for many of the reasons outlined above).

The reason this podcast (and many others) work is because they allow people another way to consume content on the go. It’s an easy way for busy people to learn more, delve into subject they don’t normally have time for, and/or just be entertained. As mentioned above, podcasts can be 5 min, 30 min, 1 hour (etc). The lengths allow for someone who consume the content while they’re completing other tasks – which is not always the case with watching a video, reading an eBook, etc. No need to flip a page, or scroll through a blog post when all you have to do is change the volume to level you prefer. This also reigns true for audible books – just check out Audible and the fact that you can subscribe to the service like Hulu or Netflix.

Podcasts may be an old content format, but old doesn’t mean bad content. It just means you need to put in the effort to make it engaging and great (like all content).

Image sources: Serial Podcast, Topsy

This post was originally written for Socialnomics.

Visual Matchup: Pinterest vs.The Fancy

Pam Sahota — Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:08:12 +0000

Do you “pin it” or do you “fancy it” or both? Pinterest may be kicking butt and taking names when it comes to members of the Pinterest community but does that give them the championship belt? Let’s assess the uniqueness and differences of both platforms.

Unique Traits and Differences: How Each Wins

Both are similar in that they provide a social community to share various interests in a visual manner including but limited to wedding plans, fashion, home décor, blog posts, infographics. However, on The Fancy people can also purchase what they see right from the site, rather than having to go to the store site to browse and purchase. What’s the benefit? Allowing brands to be where their consumers are and allowing point of purchase to be at their fingertips rather than a few clicks away. This is not to say that Pinterest isn’t valuable. It has a huge community of people and marketers realize the gold mine that it provides — especially for referral traffic to their blogs, websites, and more.

To read more on what distinguishes the two visual social networks, check out my full original post on the Startup Fashion blog. Thanks!

Marketing Strategy Today » visual

Digital Marketing Myth: Content Must be Visual

Visual Matchup: Pinterest vs.The Fancy